![]() ![]() ![]() "Slamming the political opposition was the most powerful predictor of a post going viral out of all those we measured. The scientists argue that their findings highlight the "perverse incentives" now driving discourse on major social media platforms, which in turn may fuel the political polarization threatening democratic processes in the US and elsewhere. However, the latest study shows that using terms related to the "political outgroup" is almost five times more effective than negative emotional language, and almost seven times more effective than moral emotional language, at increasing the number of shares. Previous research investigating online "virality" found that using highly emotive language increases the likelihood of social media shares-particularly negative emotions such as anger, or when conveying a sense of moral indignation. The findings are published today in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. These effects were found to be the same on both platforms, and regardless of political orientation. 'Biden' or 'Liberal' if coming from a Republican source) increased the odds of a social media post being shared by an average of 67% across the dataset. Researchers also found that each additional word referencing a rival politician or competing worldview (e.g. I think we have to question the morality of the Trump followers because their morality is not strong enough to overcome their self-interest of staying in the cult," Dodes concluded.This is according to a study led by University of Cambridge psychologists, who analyzed over 2.7 million Tweets and Facebook posts published by either US media outlets or Members of Congress from across the political spectrum. They finally say this is not right, as Liz Cheney did. People who have high moral qualities and values do stand up, we sometimes consider them heroic. "I think it has, certainly, a moral quality. Unfortunately, intelligence doesn't help you when you've got these enormous internal and external pressures to stay in line with the leader. "It helps to be stupid, but I think that they're different because there are intelligent people who are members of cult, you know? As much as some of these people who are republicans that don't seem to care about either democracy or morality are odious to us, they may be intelligent. "What is the difference between adherence to a cult and stupidity?" "Doctor, it seems that one defense against cultism, one personal defense that we might all possess - many of us might possess - is intelligence, you're simply too smart to fall for the stupidity of what's the cult is selling," O'Donnell said. O'Donnell wondered about the role intelligence plays in susceptibility to joining a cult. "On the other hand, to stand up against that, therefore, means that you aren't an outcast, you are a pariah." It is a self-affirming system, everyone agrees on the same things and they all follow and worship the leader," he continued. "The advantage of being ins such a group is that you have an echo chamber of people who are admiring you and affirming you. And a part of that, which is important to understand, is that you are also required to deny or ignore or attack those people who challenge the belief system, which is exactly what we see from many of these Trump followers, who simply act as they cannot hear and they attack those people who challenge it, which is what happened to Cheney." "If you are in one, you are required to believe the belief system of the group. "What a cult is - especially a charismatic cult, which is the kind we're talking about here where you have the all-powerful leader, Trump, who is seen as a god-like figure - those cults are self-contained, intentionally," he explained. ![]() Lance Dodes, a retired clinical professor of psychiatry at Harvard.ĭodes said, "I think the word cult is probably correct. Those quotes raised questions for O'Donnell, who wondered, "Is it a cult or is it stupidity? And what's the difference?"įor analysis, O'Donnell interviewed Dr. "I say to Republicans all the time, take back your party from this cult." "They seem to have reached rock-bottom with their statement that happened on January 6th was normal political discourse," Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said. "You know, the 'C' in RNC doesn't stand for 'committee,' it stands for 'cult.' It's not the Republican National Committee, it's the Republican National Cult," Rep. ![]() MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell began his examination of the issue with quotes from two Democratic Party leaders. 6 insurrection was " legitimate political discourse" has sparked a renewed conversation on whether Donald Trump's MAGA movement is a cult. The statement by the Republican National Committee arguing that the Jan. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |